- Indico style
- Indico style - inline minutes
- Indico style - numbered
- Indico style - numbered + minutes
- Indico Weeks View
Our understanding of the Universe is at a turning point with the predictions of the standard cosmological model and the observations from different surveys are showing tensions in several key areas. The disagreement is expressed in the value of cosmic expansion as well as in the growth of large-scale structure in the Universe. New cosmological surveys, many of which are European, may expose tension in additional areas of the concordance model. The question of cosmological tensions can be confronted in a number of ways. Firstly, survey data needs to be further analyzed for potential systematic uncertainties or biases. Secondly, there have been numerous advances in approaches to data analysis and statistics, some of which provide less dependence on cosmological models to make cosmological parameter estimates. Lastly, there are a plethora of new proposals from fundamental physics which range from novel neutrino physics to dark energy proposals (and others) which may contribute to a solution to the cosmological tensions problem. These represent the three research themes through which cosmological tensions will either be alleviated or resolved.
CosmoVerse@Istanbul 2025 (24 June – 26 June 2025, Management Committee meeting on 27 June) is the third annual conference in a series of conferences that aim to establish a link between the different research areas in cosmology with the main focus on challenges of tensions in cosmological survey data.
This conference is organized within the COST Action initiative CA21136 – Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics (CosmoVerse).
The first conference called CosmoVerse@Lisbon 2023 took place between 30 May and 1st June 2023. All of the recorded talks and presentations are public and available here. The second conference called CosmoVerse@Krakow 2024 took place between 9 and 11 July 2024. All of the recorded talks and presentations are available here.
The conference is organized together with İstanbul Technical University (ITU) in İstanbul.
You may check your visa requirement status.
Main Topics
● Observational cosmology and Systematics (cross-correlation of data, systematic effects)
● Data analysis (astrostatistics; data science in astronomy; Bayesian analysis; machine learning and artificial intelligence)
● Fundamental Physics (challenge of the cosmological hypothesis, dark energy and modified gravity, neutrino physics, dark energy, and dark matter interaction)
Invited speakers
Angus Wright (German Centre for Cosmological Lensing (GCCL) at the Ruhr Universität Bochum (RUB), Germany)
Asta Heinesen (Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark)
Brent Tully (University of Hawaii, USA)
Daniel Scolnic (Duke University, Durham, USA)
Eric Linder (Berkeley, USA)
Florian Niedermann (Nordita, Stockholm, Sweden)
Mariam Bouhmadi-López (Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Spain)
Regarding hotel bookings: conference organizers HAVE NEVER AUTHORISED ANY COMPANY to send any requests regarding accommodation or travel. We strongly advise you NOT TO reply to any emails or calls from such companies and we do not accept any responsibility for adverse consequences should you choose to do so.
Your personal data is safe with us but note that just your name and affiliation appearing at the conference web page is sometimes enough for a scammer to find your contact information at your institute's web page.
Venue
The conference will take place in İstanbul at the Maslak Ayazaga Campus of the Istanbul Technical University.
Important Dates
18 November 2024: Registration and abstract submission opens
24 April 2025: Registration and abstract submission deadline
24-26 June 2025: Conference days
24 June 2025: Welcome Drinks/ Boat Trip
25 June 2025: Poster Session and Conference Dinner
26 June 2025: Public Lecture
27 June 2025: CosmoVerse COST Action Management Committee Meeting for members
The fifth (and final) data release of the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS) provides significantly more than just an increase in survey area. Instead, additional observations couple with improvements in data quality, data reduction, and value-added data-products, to make KiDS-DR5 the most robust and reliable release produced by KiDS to date. We leverage the lensing sample from this state-of-the-art dataset (called KiDS-Legacy) to perform the most robust and precise analysis of cosmic shear to date, finding KiDS-Legacy to be wholly consistent with the results from the Planck Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) analyses. This talk will provide an introduction KiDS-DR5, discuss how this dataset differs with respect to previous KiDS releases, and focus in particular on how these differences have influenced the analysis of cosmic shear with KiDS-Legacy. I will discuss the causes of systematic variation in the parameter constraints that we observe between KiDS data releases, and discuss the implications that these systematic effects have for future analyses of cosmic shear.
Recent cosmological surveys have revealed persistent discrepancies within the context of the concordance model regarding the values of the H0 [1907.10625], σ8 [1610.04606] and ΩK [1908.09139, 1911.02087] when estimated with different datasets. Determining the level of disagreement between multidimensional fits is called "tension quantification" [1902.04029].
We approach this problem by producing a re-usable library of MCMC chains, Nested sampling runs, and machine learning emulators across a grid of cosmological models through detecting cosmological tensions between datasets from the DiRAC allocations DP192 & DP264.
This library is available as part of the package unimpeded (https://github.com/handley-lab/unimpeded) and serve as an analogous grid to the Planck Legacy Archive (PLA), but machine learning enhanced and expanded to enable not only parameter estimation (currently available with the MCMC chains on PLA), but also allowing cosmological model comparison and tension quantification, as well as including pairwise comparisons between modern cosmological datasets (CMB, BAO, Supernovae, Weak Lensing). Currently, a systematic coverage of 10 cosmological models and 60 datasets (to be extended) are easily accessible via the unimpeded package using a few lines of code. In addition, we provide machine learning emulators [2205.12841] of these marginalised likelihoods for use in future analyses as a fast and flexible alternative to MCMC chains and nested samples for re-use in future analyses.
We perform a stacking analysis of galaxy cluster velocity phase space using the caustic technique. By stacking 128 clusters, we create four robust stacked clusters with excellent agreement between caustic masses and binned medians. We model the gravitational potential using the NFW profile, validating the
The path from Cepheid variables to type Ia supernovae gives a value of the Hubble constant which significantly disagrees with the value determined from observations of conditions in the early universe and a cosmological model. A totally independent measurement of H0 from observed redshifts and distances is needed to evaluate the possibilities of systematic errors. A path is being explored that should be as accurate or better than the Cepheid-SNIa way, involving only observations of old evolved stars. Gaia parallaxes ground the absolute values of RR Lyrae stars that establish the absolute magnitudes of stars at the tip of the red giant branch that sets the scale of the power spectrum of surface brightness fluctuations in E/S0 galaxies that are observed with negligible confusion from peculiar velocities. Observations with JWST are fundamental for the success of this program.
I present an up-to-date compilation of published Hubble constant (
We explore the potential of cross-correlation between gravitational waves (GWs) and 21 cm intensity mapping (IM) from neutral hydrogen emission (HI), focusing on its role in view of future high-precision observatories, specifically Einstein Telescope (ET) and the Square Kilometer Array Observatory (SKAO). We model the large scale structure evolution by making use of 3D lightcones of the dark matter density distribution up to redshift
In this talk, I will review the latest measurements of the Hubble Constant and of dark energy from a variety of techniques. I will discuss differences in sensitivity, particularly with Type Ia supernovae, to different redshift ranges. I will also differentiate what can be producing the Hubble Tension signal versus the evolving dark energy, and offer guidance on various theoretical directions. Finally, I will forecast constraints from the next generation of telescopes like LSST and Roman on answering these problems.
One of the fundamental predictions of modern cosmology is that we should see the distant universe run slowly, with time dilated by the expansion of space. Numerous searches for this cosmic time dilation in the light curves of distant quasars, some of the most luminous objects in the universe, have failed to find the expected signal, with claims that this challenges the standard cosmological model. I present a new analysis of a sample of quasars monitored over two decades, testing competing hypotheses within a Bayesian framework to search for the influence of cosmology. The key result is that modern cosmology is safe, quasars are truly luminous objects at immense distances, and I will explore how available data and chosen approaches limited previous studies.
We present a comprehensive statistical framework for cosmological parameter estimation, focusing on Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) analyses in the light of the DESI DR2. We focus on two complementary directions: the performance evaluation of various sampling algorithms and the investigation of likelihood formulations. We will discuss the role of the choice of a sampler in both its performance as measured by runtime efficiency and parameter accuracy across different dimensionalities and probability landscapes. Then we will examine statistical nuances in BAO analysis, comparing different likelihood formulations and their effect on the parameter constraints and their higher-order distribution properties.
I will review what the prospects of quasars in the context of observational cosmology are, and I will present recent measurements of the expansion rate of the Universe based on a Hubble diagram of quasars detected up to the highest redshift ever observed (z~7.5).
The derived distances are in agreement with the standard flat ΛCDM model up to a redshift of ~1.5, but they show significant deviations at higher redshifts. Yet, several authors suggested that this discrepancy is due to inconsistencies between the low- and high-redshift sources within the parent sample, or to a redshift evolution of the relation. I will discuss these issues through a quantitative comparison with supernova-derived distances in the common redshift range, complemented by simulations showing that all the claimed inconsistencies would naturally arise from any limitation of the cosmological model adopted for the data analysis, that is, from our ignorance of the true cosmology.
I will finally show that the synergy amongst multi-wavelength facilities (current and future) will provide the needed sample statistics to obtain constraints on the observed deviations from the standard cosmological model which will rival and complement those available from the other cosmological probes.
Context. Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs), observed at redshifts as high as 9.4, could serve as valuable probes for investigating the distant Universe. However, this necessitates an increase in the number of GRBs with determined redshifts, as currently, only 12% of GRBs have known redshifts due to observational biases. Aims. We aim to address the shortage of GRBs with measured redshifts, enabling us to fully realize their potential as valuable cosmological probes Methods. Following Dainotti et al. (2024c), we have taken a second step to overcome this issue by adding 30 more GRBs to our ensemble supervised machine learning training sample, an increase of 20%, which will help us obtain better redshift estimates. In addition, we have built a freely accessible and user-friendly web app that infers the redshift of long GRBs (LGRBs) with plateau emission using our machine learning model. The web app is the first of its kind for such a study and will allow the community to obtain redshift estimates by entering the GRB parameters in the app. Results. Through our machine learning model, we have successfully estimated redshifts for 276 LGRBs using X-ray afterglow parameters detected by the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory and increased the sample of LGRBs with known redshifts by 110%. We also perform Monte Carlo simulations to demonstrate the future applicability of this research. Conclusions. The results presented in this research will enable the community to increase the sample of GRBs with known redshift estimates. This can help address many outstanding issues, such as GRB formation rate, luminosity function, and the true nature of low-luminosity GRBs, and enable the application of GRBs as standard candles
The well established ΛCDM model of cosmology suffers from several challenges and disparities like the nature of dark matter and dark energy, accelerated expansion of the Universe and tensions in cosmological parameters derived from different observations. Tomographic cross-correlation measurements from the next-generation CMB experiments and galaxy surveys will allow us to robustly quantify deviations from the ΛCDM model. However, with increasing quantity and quality of observational data, it is crucial to mitigate the systematic errors that may bias these cross-correlation measurements. In this talk, we will present forecasts on the S8 parameter from tomographic cross-correlations between the Vera C. Rubin LSST photometric galaxy survey and CMB experiments (Simons Observatory and Planck). We will discuss the importance and mitigation strategies for redshift bin mismatch of galaxies due to photometric redshift uncertainties. Although this talk will be based on LSST simulations, the results and discussions should be applicable to photometric galaxy surveys and their cross-correlations measurements in general.
In this talk, I will argue that the Hubble tension points to new physics in the early universe, between big bang nucleosynthesis and recombination. Specifically, I will propose that it might be the signature of a new phase transition in the dark sector. The latent heat released during the phase transition provides a sizeable energy injection into the cosmic fluid, shortening the sound horizon and raising the early-universe inferred value of the Hubble parameter. I will present two concrete microphysical realizations of this idea: Cold New Early Dark Energy is a triggered vacuum phase transition that occurs shortly before matter-radiation equality and shares phenomenological features with other early dark energy models. Hot New Early Dark Energy, by contrast, is a supercooled phase transition that occurs at higher redshift and heats the dark sector, providing a concrete realization of a (stepped) dark radiation model.
Supernova (SN) cosmology is based on the key assumption that the luminosity standardization process of type Ia SNe remains invariant with progenitor age. However, our comprehensive age measurements of 360 SN host galaxies reveal a significant (5.5 sigma) correlation between standardized SN luminosity and progenitor age, which is expected to introduce a serious systematic bias with redshift in SN cosmology. After correcting for this age bias with redshift, the SN dataset aligns more closely with the recent DESI BAO result, bringing the revised 'standard candle' (SNe) into concordance with the 'standard ruler' (BAO). When the three cosmological probes (SNe, BAO, CMB) are combined, we find a strong (> 7 sigma) tension with the LCDM model, suggesting a time-varying dark energy equation of state in a currently non-accelerating universe.
I will discuss two research projects about testing DDE and Constraining high-\texorpdfstring{
Dark energy away from a cosmological constant Λ – like early universe inflation that ends – can be understood in terms of well defined physical behaviors. These guide dark energy into thawing or freezing classes, with w0–wa arising as a physical calibration of the phase space. Other regions of phase space – zones of avoidance – require violation of some basic principle. We explore these cases, drawing a direct analogy with how non-Gaussianity in inflation can add physics beyond standard dynamics. We examine the physics implications if the best fit of current data is taken to be truth.
The Dark Energy Survey (DES) recently released the final results of its two main probes of the expansion history: Type Ia Supernovae (SN) and Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations (BAO). In this work, we explore the cosmological implications of these data in combination with external Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN), and age-of-the-Universe information. The BAO measurement, which is
Gravitational wave (GW) and multi-messenger (MM) astronomy provides new ways to gain insights into the Dark Energy (DE) phenomenology, through the distance-redshift relation, as well as into potential deviations from General Relativity (GR), via the distance duality relation. Both analyses involve the same astrophysical observables, making MM astronomy a powerful tool to explore simultaneously the nature of DE and gravity.
To this end, provided our current ability to localize
We compare the performance of standard DE and MG parametrizations with a more flexible, model-independent method based on Gaussian Processes (GP). We examine synergies among next-generation GW interferometers and cosmological probes such as Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), Type IA Supernovae (SnIA) and Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) data. We capitalize on their complementarity to break parameter degeneracies, showing that fewer than 40 GRB-GW events will provide unprecedented accuracy in constraining the DE phenomenology as well as potential departures from GR.
I will present a series of works looking for evidence of the effects induced by seemingly different extensions to the standard cosmological model in the cosmic microwave background (CMB) primary and secondary anisotropies: modified gravity, massive neutrinos and non-vanishing spatial curvature. By looking at their correlations and the differences in the impact they have on cosmological observables, such as the CMB lensing potential spectrum, we assess whether such additions, according to current CMB data, can be told apart.
Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO), together with Type Ia Supernovae (SNeIa), increasingly disfavor late-time modifications as viable resolutions to the Hubble tension. A key argument against post-recombination solutions—the so-called “no-go theorem”—relies critically on BAO data: since BAO constrain angular scales proportional to rdH0, a higher H0 implies a smaller rd, in tension with the value inferred from ΛCDM fits to Planck or BBN+BAO. However, the BAO analysis pipeline involves several steps that assume a fiducial cosmology, raising concerns about potential model dependence. In this proof-of-principle work, we explore the impact of a possible miscalibration (whose origin we remain agnostic about) in the BAO scale that effectively shifts the inferred BAO positions closer to the observer, leading to larger values of rdH0. We find that, even if such a modification were present, “popular” late-time modifications would still fall short of resolving the Hubble tension, to no small extent because of tight constraints on the shape of the expansion history arising from high-redshift uncalibrated SNeIa.
Combinations of the most recent CMB, BAO, and SNeIa datasets, when analyzed using the CPL parametrization,
The cosmic dipole measured in surveys of cosmologically distant sources is generally in disagreement with the kinematic expectation of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB). This discrepancy represents severe tension with the Cosmological Principle and challenges the standard model of cosmology. We present a Bayesian analysis that quantifies the tension between datasets used to measure the cosmic dipole. Here, we examine active galaxies in the NRAO VLA Sky Survey (NVSS), the Rapid ASKAP Continuum Survey (RACS) and the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer catalogue (CatWISE), and jointly analyse them with the Planck LFI observations of the CMB. Whilst we find that the Planck–quasar-dipole tension is strong, we conclude that deeper radio observations are required to disentangle the Planck–radio-dipole tension, which may be detectable at high significance in the near-future.
Cosmic voids, the largest observable structures in the Universe and characterized by a scarcity of galaxies, impact the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) through gravitational lensing, leaving a negative imprint on the CMB convergence (κ) map. This imprint offers insights into matter distribution within voids and the growth of cosmic structures. Furthermore, voids produce secondary CMB anisotropies via the Integrated Sachs–Wolfe (ISW) effect, which manifest as colder regions in the CMB and serve as probes of the Universe’s accelerated expansion. Motivated by debates on the ISW effect’s strength from voids and its potential link to the CMB Cold Spot, we explore the CMB lensing signatures of voids to test the ΛCDM model using N-body simulations. For this reason, we cross-correlated Planck CMB κ maps with voids from DES Y3, covering approximately 4 200 square degrees, employing both the 2D void-finder and the new Voxel 3D void-finder. Applying optimal matched filtering based on MICE N-body simulations, we measured the lensing amplitude Aκ = 1.03 ± 0.22 (4.6σ) for Voxel and Aκ = 1.02 ± 0.17 (5.9σ) for 2D voids, aligning with ΛCDM predictions. Inverting the void-finding process to identify superclusters yielded Aκ = 0.87 ± 0.15 (5.9σ). Our analysis indicates good agreement with the consensus ΛCDM model, with no deficit or excess signals identified. We also show that Planck noise is the primary limitation, suggesting that future data from the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT), Simons Observatory (SO), South Pole Telescope (SPT), and CMB-S4 will enhance sensitivity and enable more precise measurements. Upcoming observational programs such as the Roman Space Telescope, Euclid, and LSST are expected to provide data sets that will allow the statistics of cosmic voids to be exploited as a stringent probe of the ΛCDM and to deliver significantly tighter constraints on cosmological parameters.
We explore an interacting dark sector model in trace-free Einstein gravity where dark energy has a constant equation of state,
Cosmography is conventionally used to analyze data in an FLRW metric while being agnostic to the field equations of gravity.
I will talk about how we can go one step further to obtain a cosmography that is free of assumptions about the space-time metric as well.
With this approach, we can in principle obtain model-independent information about the expansion and curvature of our anisotropic cosmic neighbourhood, given sufficiently accurate observations of luminosity distance, angular diameter distance, redshift drift, position drift, etc. Such cosmography methods are complementary to the conventional more model-dependent approaches, and while they require high-precision data they hold a great promise for enabling model-independent constraints in cosmology. I will describe the formalism for doing anisotropic cosmography with luminosity distance, redshift drift, and position drift data, and I will discuss things that are good to be aware of when using cosmography methods in practice.
We formulate topological holographic dark energy and we present how it can alleviate both
I discuss our ongoing efforts to measure the cosmic dipole in new galaxy surveys, referencing the systematic effects which can influence its measurement and forecasting the contribution of forthcoming surveys. This is motivated by the nascent cosmic dipole tension: the disagreement between the CMB dipole and counts of extragalactic sources, which has reached a high level of statistical significance (
We are currently witnessing a remarkable era in the fields of cosmology and gravitation, as an ever-increasing amount of observational data continues to be collected. One of the most perplexing questions confronting cosmologists today concerns the mysterious source responsible for the Universe’s recent accelerated expansion. The most widely accepted explanations for this phenomenon involve either a dark energy component or a modified theory of gravity. In this talk, we present, on the one hand, several dark energy models, ranging from axion-like scalar fields and kinetic gravity braiding models to 3-form fields. On the other hand, we explore modified theories of gravity, in particular those based on
The standard Lambda Cold Dark Matter (ΛCDM) cosmological model has proven remarkably successful in describing a broad range of observational data, ranging from the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation to the large-scale structure of the Universe. However, recent advances in precision cosmology have revealed persistent statistical discrepancies between independent data sets and observational methods. One prominent example is the "Hubble tension," which refers to the irreconcilable predictions of the present expansion rate of the Universe when inferred from early-Universe measurements (such as the CMB) compared to local observations. Low-redshift observables like Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) and Type Ia Supernovae (SN1a) are used to build the cosmological distance ladder, which relies on calibrations using either early- or late-Universe data. Therefore, the Hubble tension is also reflected in the incompatibility between these distances and how they are calibrated. However, this comparison assumes that the distance-duality relationship (DDR) holds and can be used to compare measurements of the luminosity and angular diameter distances. In this talk, we will examine the implications of relaxing this assumption to more general relations, its implications to the current cosmic tensions and how it could potentially explain the apparent need for the introduction of new physics to address current cosmic tensions.
We propose a novel dark energy mechanism rooted in the microscopic structure of spacetime, where quantum-induced topological transitions give rise to an effective cosmological constant. Within the framework of Euclidean Quantum Gravity, gravitational instantons emerging at the spacetime foam level induce changes in topology, activating the Gauss-Bonnet term in four dimensions. This leads to a time-evolving dark energy density proportional to the instanton density. Using quantum field theory techniques, we derive the corresponding modified Friedmann equations and analyze the evolution of the Universe under this framework. The model successfully reproduces the thermal history of the Universe and yields a fit to observational data - including type Ia supernovae, Baryon Acoustic Oscillations, and cosmic chronometers - that is statistically comparable to the standard
Hydrodynamic simulations will be instrumental in attempting to resolve cosmological tensions such as the
In the era of high precision Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) anisotropy measurements, detection of the primordial graviational waves (PGW) will be one of the main goals of the upcoming CMB experiments. To make it possible precise cleaning of the CMB maps from diffused contamination coming from polarised galactic emission and CMB gravitational lensing effect is needed. We investigate the impact of residual galactic foregrounds in lensing reconstruction and delensing for CMB-S4 like experiment providing a complete pipeline for such experiment. This impact can be also important for the constraint on the
The effect of gravitational lensing of the Cosmic Microwave Background
(CMB) provides a unique opportunity to obtain a picture of the gravitational potential of the large-scale structure of the Universe at very high redshifts. Tomographic cross-correlation of the gravitational potential with other tracers of the large-scale structure at known redshifts allows tracing the evolution of the structure through estimation of the matter fluctuation amplitude
We investigate a theoretical framework for the Universe dynamics, based on the possible creation of dark energy constituents by the time-varying gravitational field of the expanding Universe. The proposed scenario is compared to specific cases of the reduced Chevallier-Polarski-Linder (CPL) parameterization, with the aim of probing the nature of dark energy.
We construct, from our model and the reference models, a theoretical running Hubble constant, i.e. a function of the redshift, which highlights the difference between modified dynamics and the
The main result of our study is the identification of a strong sensitivity of the running Hubble constant and the demonstration that the binned supernova data indicates a phantom nature of Dark Energy for $0
In my talk, I will present a model where the Universe is filled with a phantom scalar field with a potential in the form of a hyperbolic tangent, as well as cold dark matter and radiation. This model is free from the shortcomings usually attributed to phantom models and undergoes a rapid Anti-de Sitter to de Sitter transition. At the background level, a detailed analysis of the model is performed. The numerical integration of the equations of motion is performed in such a way that both the CMB and SH0ES data are satisfied. Thus, this model points to a possible solution to the problem of cosmological tensions in theories where the cosmological constant changes its sign.
Earlier studies investigating the allowed fraction of dark matter as primordial black holes (PBHs) tend to completely rule out PBHs with masses smaller than \~10⁻¹⁵ solar masses. This is due to the lack of evidence for Hawking radiation coming from the final evaporation stages of such small PBHs. These limits, however, make the key assumption that these PBHs can be modelled as uncharged, non-rotating Schwarzschild black holes. This talk concerns changes to these lower mass bounds when charge is included i.e., by going to Reissner–Nordström black holes as models for PBHs. In particular, the analysis presented here assumes a "dark" U(1) charge (assumed to be present in the early universe), and employs the Hiscock and Weems model for charged black hole evaporation to properly account for the Schwinger effect. By assigning a heavier dark electron mass and/or increasing its charge, this approach not only suppresses Hawking radiation but also mitigates Schwinger pair production, effectively extending the lifespan of PBHs beyond the age of the universe, bypassing the conventional wisdom that such small-mass black holes would have evaporated entirely by now.
Based on https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.20696